Thanks timr at Green Living London for updating us on ash dieback.
Advertisements
Science on the Land
-
Recent Posts
- How genetic modification is done: 1. Agrobacterium
- Biotechnology in Action
- New contact details
- Neonic makers might pay for research about neonics on the land
- A neonic that’s bad news for birds
- Hello Ms Truss
- Goodbye Mr Paterson
- SĂ©ralini’s rat-feeding trial (part 5)
- New SĂ©ralini study shows Roundup damages sperm
- America’s dwindling diversity
Tags
academia alien species America arthropod Asia bacterium biotechnology breeding cattle child climate conservation corn crop crop variety data development disease ecosystem Europe farm farmer feed finance finfish food food safety food security forest garden genetic modification grain grocery herbicide history honeybee human hunting hymenopteran insect insecticide knowledge land use law livestock maize mammal meat Monsanto native species nutrition pest pesticide plant_dicot plant_monocot politics pollination population poverty research rice ruminant sea seed selective breeding staple food sustainable trade tree vertebrate water wild bee wild food wildlife woodland
Also on the ash diebac:
http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=29984
diebac=dieback 🙂
Yes the response is about 5 years too late. But here we are. What do you think should be done now?
I’m intrigued by what the Socialist Worker says about Japanese tree strains. Do you know where the science is about that?
I’ve just done some goofling and found nothing about resistant strains of F. excelsior in Japan. The current article on Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ash_dieback mentions ‘an Asian species known as Manchurian ash (Fraxinus mandschurica)’ so perhaps the Socialist Worker journalist was talking about hybrids between that species and our European F. excelsior.
Here’s what Wikipedia says about the Manchurian ash http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraxinus_mandschurica It doesn’t sound suitable for Britain because it needs the seasonal extremes of a continental climate.