Global Warming debate is no debate at all

Eideard

Funny thing happens sometimes when you look at who the witnesses are in a public policy debate . . .

FACT” organizations from Is There a Scientific Consensus on Global Warming?, SkepticalScience.com.“FRAUD” organizations are petitioners v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.

Click the link in the paragraph above to see the comparison. Barry Ritholtz knocks it out of the park, once again.

View original post

Advertisements

About argylesock

I wrote a PhD about veterinary parasitology so that's the starting point for this blog. But I'm now branching out into other areas of biology and into popular science writing. I'll write here about science that happens in landscapes, particularly farmland, and about science involving interspecific interactions. Datasets and statistics get my attention. Exactly where this blog will lead? That's a journey that I'm on and I hope you'll come with me.
This entry was posted in weather and climate and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Global Warming debate is no debate at all

  1. EqFe says:

    I’m not an Al Gore fan since he doesn’t practice what he preaches, but I think the his coining the phrase, “Inconvenient Truth” when it comes to this topic was just brilliant.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s